GMAT Math Prep Course
| Author | : | |
| Rating | : | 4.69 (944 Votes) |
| Asin | : | 1889057509 |
| Format Type | : | paperback |
| Number of Pages | : | 528 Pages |
| Publish Date | : | 2015-02-28 |
| Language | : | English |
DESCRIPTION:
Comprehensive Prep for GMAT Math. Now you can get the same preparation in a book. * Performance: If your target is a 700+ score, this is the book! . * Practice: Includes 164 examples and more than 600 exercises! Arranged from easy to medium to hard to very hard. Although the GMAT math section is difficult, it is very learnable. GMAT Math Prep Course presents a thorough analysis of GMAT math and introduces numerous analytic techniques that will help you immensely, not only on the GMAT but in business school as well. Features: * Comprehensive Review: Twenty-three chapters provide complete review of GMAT math. * Diagnostic Test: The diagnostic test measures your strengths and weaknesses and directs you to areas you need to study more. Every year, students pay $1,000 and more to test prep companies to prepare for the math section of the GMAT
Amazon Customer said The extra layers (and the icing) necessary for the 750 cake. I used this book after using some of MGMAT's books. The GMAT Math Prep Course text is excellent, with many, many examples and reasonably good explanations. HOWEVER, you have to have a SOLID FOUNDATION to be able to use this book because it focuses (mostly) on 600-800 level problems without explaining all the finer math principle details (author assumes that you know them, and you will, if you use the MGMAT guide Manhattan GMAT Set of 8 Strategy Guides, Fourth Edition (Manhattan . John said Great book, but small problems. First off, this is a great little book that I'd absolutely recommend to anybody that is looking to brush up on the quant part of the test. It goes into all the topics in great detail, includes simple and easily remembered tips for eliminating answer choices on the harder questions, and gives you small equations which (while unnecessary) can really help you come test day. The reason I give the Kindle version four stars instead of five is it has a few problems. The big thing is ty. Trailride said Abundant with Misprints. Who edits this stuff? Obviously no one because the misprints in this book are horrible. It's difficult enough to go through the different equations and understand the explanations while having to pick out all the misprints in each equation. For example, on page "Abundant with Misprints" according to Trailride. Who edits this stuff? Obviously no one because the misprints in this book are horrible. It's difficult enough to go through the different equations and understand the explanations while having to pick out all the misprints in each equation. For example, on page 2Abundant with Misprints Trailride Who edits this stuff? Obviously no one because the misprints in this book are horrible. It's difficult enough to go through the different equations and understand the explanations while having to pick out all the misprints in each equation. For example, on page 248, there are at least 13 instances where either an equation symbol (=) or a "greater than or equal to" symbol is used instead of where a subtraction symbol (-) should be used. This is pathetic, Nova. I have the copyrigh. 8, there are at least 1Abundant with Misprints Who edits this stuff? Obviously no one because the misprints in this book are horrible. It's difficult enough to go through the different equations and understand the explanations while having to pick out all the misprints in each equation. For example, on page 2Abundant with Misprints Trailride Who edits this stuff? Obviously no one because the misprints in this book are horrible. It's difficult enough to go through the different equations and understand the explanations while having to pick out all the misprints in each equation. For example, on page 248, there are at least 13 instances where either an equation symbol (=) or a "greater than or equal to" symbol is used instead of where a subtraction symbol (-) should be used. This is pathetic, Nova. I have the copyrigh. 8, there are at least 13 instances where either an equation symbol (=) or a "greater than or equal to" symbol is used instead of where a subtraction symbol (-) should be used. This is pathetic, Nova. I have the copyrigh. instances where either an equation symbol (=) or a "greater than or equal to" symbol is used instead of where a subtraction symbol (-) should be used. This is pathetic, Nova. I have the copyrigh. Abundant with Misprints Trailride Who edits this stuff? Obviously no one because the misprints in this book are horrible. It's difficult enough to go through the different equations and understand the explanations while having to pick out all the misprints in each equation. For example, on page 248, there are at least 13 instances where either an equation symbol (=) or a "greater than or equal to" symbol is used instead of where a subtraction symbol (-) should be used. This is pathetic, Nova. I have the copyrigh. 8, there are at least 1Abundant with Misprints Who edits this stuff? Obviously no one because the misprints in this book are horrible. It's difficult enough to go through the different equations and understand the explanations while having to pick out all the misprints in each equation. For example, on page 2Abundant with Misprints Trailride Who edits this stuff? Obviously no one because the misprints in this book are horrible. It's difficult enough to go through the different equations and understand the explanations while having to pick out all the misprints in each equation. For example, on page 248, there are at least 13 instances where either an equation symbol (=) or a "greater than or equal to" symbol is used instead of where a subtraction symbol (-) should be used. This is pathetic, Nova. I have the copyrigh. 8, there are at least 13 instances where either an equation symbol (=) or a "greater than or equal to" symbol is used instead of where a subtraction symbol (-) should be used. This is pathetic, Nova. I have the copyrigh. instances where either an equation symbol (=) or a "greater than or equal to" symbol is used instead of where a subtraction symbol (-) should be used. This is pathetic, Nova. I have the copyrigh
--A Student . I went through the MGMAT books and still found Nova's book a good alternative. I think it might be worthwhile for you to go through another good math book: checkout Nova's 'GMAT Math Prep Course'. Nova's exercises emphasize more creative thinking than do the MGMAT's books